[OSM-talk] [tagging] Against source=survey
Karl Newman
siliconfiend at gmail.com
Tue May 6 20:57:44 BST 2008
Why not go all the way and say source=cesium? In all seriousness, though,
what's wrong with source=GPS as an alternative? Survey, to me, implies a
crew out with tripods and such.
Karl
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio <
jldominguez at prodevelop.es> wrote:
> The tag source=survey hides the fact that those coordinates were derived
> from the signal provided by a particular infrastructure: the US satellites.
> Maybe those ways derived from GPS tracks should be tagged source=NASA or
> source=Pentagon, instead of source=survey, which does not cite the true
> source. Just to prevent people from believing that cartography consists in
> switching the on/off button of a toy called Garmin...
>
> Lucas
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080506/4b802373/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list