[OSM-talk] simplifying mapnik layout definition

[Martijn van Oosterhout]

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Andreas Barth <aba at not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> This drops the (IMHO unnecessary) LineSymbolizer (one can make it up
> from the stuff around it) and emphasizes the differences. If this looks
> ok-ish, I could write an converter from the new to the old format as an
> starter.

Nice idea except, what if for a single feature I want there to be a
LineSymbolizer and a PolygonSymbolizer and a PointSymbolizer. Are you
going to magically infer that also?

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/