[OSM-talk] Revisit hour_on/hour_off? [tagging]
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists)
andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org
Tue Nov 4 19:47:12 GMT 2008
It is currently possible to set up access restrictions[1], and then use
hour_on, day_on and date_on and their *_off equivalents to state that
the "access closure" is lifted at some times. I take this as meaning
that all normally restricted traffic is permitted as if it were
foo_access=yes between say hour_off and hour_on.
Near where I live, there is a street that is motorcar=no|bicycle=no for
most of the day, but which lifts its bicycle=no restriction *but not*
its motorcar=no restriction between 18:00-07:00 approx. This is
signposted, but cannot be tagged in the current scheme.
I know that
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Access_restrictions
and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/access:_name_space
have mentioned this drawback with the existing scheme, but these
proposals are enormous lumbering affairs that try to replace the entire
access tagging scheme, and which are in competition with each other for
resources. It's like watching dinosaurs or something.
The small egg-stealing proto-mammal in me has an itch it wants to
scratch *right now*, so what do people feel about
motorcar:hour_off
motorcar:hour_on
or in other words
<mode>:<period>_{on|off}
with logic like a global access=foo being overridden by more specific
cases like motorcar=bar? In other words, patterned after the current
scheme; a global hour_on would be overridden by a more specific
motorcar:hour_on.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:access
--
Andrew Chadwick
More information about the talk
mailing list