[OSM-talk] Edit war on the wiki "map features"

sylvain letuffe liste at letuffe.org
Tue Nov 25 19:41:27 GMT 2008


> The place for an "approved" tag which is not widely used is Approved
> features, not Map Features.

That could be a solution. And I think that's where we need to go anyway as the 
map feature page is just too big. 
What you seams to propose here is keep "the good tags well in view" and 
the "bad tags hidden somewhere"
I would agree with the idea, but what is bad or wrong ?

Since it's hard to answer, it seams to be "in the air" that a used tag is 
good, and an unused tag is bad. But I don't agree with that.

Arguments are on my other (rather too long) message

PS: just for bad faith :
So is GNU/linux bad right ?
So is OSM bad right ?

-- 
Sylvain Letuffe liste at letuffe.org
qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org






More information about the talk mailing list