[OSM-talk] Turn restriction docs

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Sun Nov 30 18:02:13 GMT 2008


Hi,

Nic Roets wrote:
> My guess is that your opposition is based on the fact that some (future)
> routing system may not have enough information to calculate angles esp. when
> non-junction nodes was removed during prepossessing.

I simply want a clear, non-interpreted rule that identifies the 
participating bits of road because I fear that many of these ideas are 
not safe against future modifications of the junction. I'm thinking of a 
T shaped junction where maybe someone adds a "sharp right" turning 
service way; unless we very very clearly say that the textual 
information in "no right turn" doesn't count, there may be people who 
interpret this as being stronger than anything expressed by relation 
members and think it applies to the service way.

> Gosmore currently sees all restrictions as "maneuvers that are disallowed"
> and none of them as "maneuvers that are compulsory". Another
> misunderstanding.

Initially this way my plan as well - a restriction, after all, is 
something that restricts your options. But then someone introduced the 
"restriction" tag, and others started to put in values like "only left 
turn"... which does match the signs here in Germany, strictly speaking 
we have no "no right turn" sign, we only have "only straight on or left" 
signs...

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"




More information about the talk mailing list