[OSM-talk] [Tagging] - RFC - Motorway_link implies oneway=??

Shaun McDonald shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
Thu Oct 2 10:09:18 BST 2008


I assume that everything is two way (including motorway,  
motorway_link, trunk and trunk_link) unless there is a oneway=yes/true/ 
1 tag.

Shaun
On 2 Oct 2008, at 09:47, Lambertus wrote:

> I've been getting reports about routing problems where bi-directional
> traffic is allowed on motorway_link roads. The map features page does
> not state clearly which oneway value is implied however: The green box
> states oneway=yes is implied, the descriptive text implies oneway=no.
>
> It's time to correct this page to get rid of this contradiction. So
> what's it going to be, do we imply oneway=yes?
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2433 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20081002/499a410d/attachment.bin>


More information about the talk mailing list