[OSM-talk] [Tagging] - RFC - Motorway_link implies oneway=??

[Nic Roets]

Isn't a motorway by definition divided and therefore oneway ?

My opinion is that motorway and motorway_link must both default to
oneway=true, as the bi-directional varieties are non-existent / very rare.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Shaun McDonald
<shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk>wrote:

> I assume that everything is two way (including motorway, motorway_link,
> trunk and trunk_link) unless there is a oneway=yes/true/1 tag.
>
> Shaun
>
> On 2 Oct 2008, at 09:47, Lambertus wrote:
>
>  I've been getting reports about routing problems where bi-directional
>> traffic is allowed on motorway_link roads. The map features page does
>> not state clearly which oneway value is implied however: The green box
>> states oneway=yes is implied, the descriptive text implies oneway=no.
>>
>> It's time to correct this page to get rid of this contradiction. So
>> what's it going to be, do we imply oneway=yes?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20081002/4180b258/attachment.html>