[OSM-talk] amenity=vending_machine AND amenity=post_box: what about?
Norbert Wenzel
n_wenzel at gmx.net
Mon Sep 8 18:33:00 BST 2008
Karl Newman wrote:
> Just make two different nodes, each located closest to the amenity
> concerned. There's nothing that makes it non-routable. It's just a
> point--the routers will get you as close to the point on the road as
> possible. The addr: property definitely isn't going to help in making it
> routable.
You're right with the addr: property, that was not well thought from my
side. But I'd nevertheless prefer the double amenities, just because the
that's what those nodes are. One building or machine with multiple uses
at the very same place.
Norbert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3233 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080908/d28cc506/attachment.bin>
More information about the talk
mailing list