[OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

[Steven te Brinke]

The returned data looks quite the same as before the weekend, thus the 
bugfix has resolved the problem.

Thanks,
Steven


80n schreef:
> I've found a bug and fixed it.  Can you try again and let me know how it goes?
>
> 80n
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, 80n <80n80n at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I changed something at the weekend, so that's where I'll start looking...
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Steven te Brinke
>> <s.tebrinke at student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>>     
>>> It looks like it became broken a few days ago. Because last week I got the
>>> results I expected when querying for the rcn of the Netherlands, but this
>>> week I am missing quite some information. (I use nearly the same query as
>>> Lambertus.) So I think around the weekend something went wrong with a
>>> database update.
>>> Thanks for looking at it.
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> 80n schreef:
>>>
>>> Lambertus
>>> Yes, its likely to be a bug.  I'll take a look at it.
>>>
>>> 80n
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Lambertus <osm at na1400.info> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Thanks for looking at it and you are right, only one predicate and one
>>>> bbox predicate is allowed, I missed that. Unfortunately when I request
>>>> again with only one predicate, the result is almost the same (data from
>>>> far outside the bbox and missing ways and nodes without ways):
>>>>
>>>> /api/0.5/relation[network=rcn][bbox=5.5,52.0,6.3,52.3]
>>>>
>>>> Chris Hill wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Lambertus wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Either I don't understand how querying OSMXAPI works or I stumbled
>>>>>> upon a bug. Perhaps someone can have a look at this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /api/0.5/relation[route=bicycle][network=rcn][bbox=5.5,52.0,6.3,52.3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> I don't think you can use multiple predicates.  The wiki says:
>>>>>
>>>>> A request can be suffixed with multiple predicates, each of which
>>>>> further constrains the results (currently limited to one tag predicate
>>>>> and one bbox predicate)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Chris
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> talk mailing list
>>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>>         
>>> ________________________________
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>       
>>