[OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

[80n]

Steven
Excellent.  I think we can blame the dodgy NFS on hypercube for the missing
data.  I re-synchronized it last night, so I'm pleased to hear that all is
ok.

I'll take a look at the relations issue some time - maybe the bbox
calculation is off or something.

Thanks for reporting back.
80n

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Steven te Brinke <
s.tebrinke at student.utwente.nl> wrote:

>  The problem that some nodes were missing and that there were ways without
> nodes is gone now. Thus all real problems are gone. I only receive slightly
> more relations than expected, but that's not really a problem for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Steven
>
>
> 80n schreef:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Steven te Brinke<s.tebrinke at student.utwente.nl> <s.tebrinke at student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>
>
>  Taking a closer look at the data, there are some strange things indeed.
> However, these are not new, they are already in there several weeks.
> I retrieve all routes in the netherlands:
> relation[network=rcn][bbox=2.7984557419334006,50.62642256377723,7.388298070963748,53.954129036190224]
>
> Problems:
> - some relations are outside the bbox, for example relation 5881 (at least,
> as far as I can see, I didn't compute the bbox of the relation)
>
>
>  I think I know why that is.
>
>
>
>  - quite some nodes are missing (they are referenced by ways that are
> returned)
> - a few ways do not contain any nodes, for example way 24828122, whereas the
> main api returns two nodes
>
>
>  This way is missing from one of the zappy instances, but present in
> the others.  Looks like it may have lost synchronisation during the
> recent NFS hiccups.  I'll pull it offline and re-sync it.
>
>
>
>  For now I just ignore these, so it's no problem to me. But if you want more
> information on these problems, I can easily give a list of all nodes/ways
> with the last two problems.
>
> Steven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080912/e6865881/attachment.html>