[OSM-talk] OSMXAPI question: is it me, or...

[Steven te Brinke]

The problem that some nodes were missing and that there were ways 
without nodes is gone now. Thus all real problems are gone. I only 
receive slightly more relations than expected, but that's not really a 
problem for me.

Thanks,
Steven


80n schreef:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Steven te Brinke
> <s.tebrinke at student.utwente.nl> wrote:
>   
>> Taking a closer look at the data, there are some strange things indeed.
>> However, these are not new, they are already in there several weeks.
>> I retrieve all routes in the netherlands:
>> relation[network=rcn][bbox=2.7984557419334006,50.62642256377723,7.388298070963748,53.954129036190224]
>>
>> Problems:
>> - some relations are outside the bbox, for example relation 5881 (at least,
>> as far as I can see, I didn't compute the bbox of the relation)
>>     
>
> I think I know why that is.
>
>   
>> - quite some nodes are missing (they are referenced by ways that are
>> returned)
>> - a few ways do not contain any nodes, for example way 24828122, whereas the
>> main api returns two nodes
>>     
>
> This way is missing from one of the zappy instances, but present in
> the others.  Looks like it may have lost synchronisation during the
> recent NFS hiccups.  I'll pull it offline and re-sync it.
>
>   
>> For now I just ignore these, so it's no problem to me. But if you want more
>> information on these problems, I can easily give a list of all nodes/ways
>> with the last two problems.
>>
>> Steven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20080912/b74eb3c6/attachment.html>