[OSM-talk] Tagging dangerous areas

[Paul Johnson]

Matt Amos wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Brian Quinion
> <openstreetmap at brian.quinion.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>> <ajrlists at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> This should be tagged in a different way that uses fact instead of
>>> opinion/fiction. Perhaps by referring to crime statistics for a given
>>> boundary area.
>> How about:
>>
>> i_was_violently_threatened_while_trying_to_map_this=yes
>>
>> Speaking from my experience of this weekend :-(
> 
> after the wembley mapping party last year i heard suggestions of a
> "locals=angry" tag. maybe we should expand that to include
> "locals=violent" or "locals=heavily_armed"?

Too vague.  locals=violent would apply to much of the US...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090403/c7b8fd76/attachment.pgp>