[OSM-talk] xybot

[Jukka Rahkonen]

Florian Lohoff <flo <at> rfc822.org> writes:


> 
> And in the above case there are a bunch of people who disagree with
> using landuse=wood. And it doesnt even fit the keys definition by
> which landuse means PEOPLEs use - Wood is not peoples use by definition
> of the value. So landuse cant be used with wood as from whats in the
> key and value description in the wiki.
> 
> Buts thats just my POV so you are free to tag as you like ...

There are people like you and people who think
"But thats just my POV so you are free to tag as you like ...
for me it is just the same because I will drive over your poor 
tagging with my robot anyway." 

When it comes to landuse, I feel that the deal between "natural" and "landuse"
is not extraordinary well defined.  I would let people to play with their own
tagging, or even use some existing classification, for example Corine landcover
classification http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/download.asp?id=17939&filetype=.csv