[OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

[Joseph Scanlan]

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Lester Caine wrote:

> Currently there SHOULD be a landuse/natural tag for each area on a map as
> using amenity= creates another level of complexity. One may still has to
> decide what to use for landuse if the tag itself is missing. I still think
> 'landuse=natural' with a sub tag of natural= is the correct framework ...

Thanks everyone for the input.

In this case I'm going with landuse=retail.  The hotel itself is tagged 
building=yes, tourism=hotel.

I suppose if a hotel is surrounded by commercial landuse then there's no 
point making a little retail island to hold it.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Scanlan
+1-702-455-3679                                  http://www.n7xsd.us/
jps at co.clark.nv.us (work)                   (not work) n7xsd at arrl.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------

So he went inside there to take on what he found.
But he never escaped them, for who can escape what he desires?
                                               --Tony Banks of Genesis
                                                    in "The Lady Lies"