[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Alex L. Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Tue Aug 11 17:38:35 BST 2009
Gustav Foseid wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de
> <mailto:osm at tobias-knerr.de>> wrote:
>
> Those eight people can only do this if not even 0.1% of the other 10000
> care enough to oppose the proposal. If that's the case, then apparently
> the proposal isn't so bad, is it? Why didn't all those people who
> apparently hate "path" vote against it?
>
>
> If you look at the voting results, you will see that it was rather
> disputed from the start:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Path#Voting
The arguments against come down to two things:
"It's complex" (false)
"I don't see a need for a generic path" (OK, but others do)
Not so disputed after all.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090811/56c52705/attachment.pgp>
More information about the talk
mailing list