[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Norbert Hoffmann
nhoffmann at spamfence.net
Tue Aug 11 23:23:40 BST 2009
Greg Troxel wrote:
>For highway=cycleway, clearly bicycle=designated is implied.
Do you really think, that this is the case for *every* way tagged as
cycleway? Others have expressed the opinion, that "bicycle=yes foot=yes"
should be tagged as highway=cycleway too.
One advantage of Highway=path is, that there is no implication besides "not
wide enough to be a track".
norbert
More information about the talk
mailing list