[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

Norbert Hoffmann nhoffmann at spamfence.net
Tue Aug 11 23:23:40 BST 2009


Greg Troxel wrote:

>For highway=cycleway, clearly bicycle=designated is implied.

Do you really think, that this is the case for *every* way tagged as
cycleway? Others have expressed the opinion, that "bicycle=yes foot=yes"
should be tagged as highway=cycleway too.

One advantage of Highway=path is, that there is no implication besides "not
wide enough to be a track".

norbert





More information about the talk mailing list