[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway
Roy Wallace
waldo000000 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 23:49:30 BST 2009
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Norbert
Hoffmann<nhoffmann at spamfence.net> wrote:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> One advantage of Highway=path is, that there is no implication besides "not
> wide enough to be a track".
+1
Implications are fine only if they are consistent (i.e. consistently
used as documented on the wiki). This is not the case for
cycleway/footway, and therefore, no implications is infinitely better
than inconsistent implications.
More information about the talk
mailing list