[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Alex Mauer]

On 08/11/2009 01:58 PM, DavidD wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de>:
> 
>> Those eight people can only do this if not even 0.1% of the other 10000
>> care enough to oppose the proposal. If that's the case, then apparently
>> the proposal isn't so bad, is it? Why didn't all those people who
>> apparently hate "path" vote against it?
> 
> I originally did vote against it. Then when it looked like the vote
> would go the wrong way it was stopped before being started again some
> time later after tweaking the proposal.

Yup.  Problems were brought up (primarily the idea of deprecating
footway/bridleway/cycleway), so they were corrected.  Seems like a good
practice to me, and a large part of the purpose of the whole voting system.

-Alex Mauer "hawke"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090811/81d61f47/attachment.pgp>