[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Gustav Foseid]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:

> In the strict (German) use case, you need to distinguish between
> bicycle=<allowed/suitable> and bicycle=<road sign>.  This is not about
> marking a default, this is about describing the real situation precise
> enough to make deductions about access rights for _other_ traffic.
>

highway=cycleway (allowed and suitable)
bicycle=dedicated (road sign)
bicycle=yes => (not road sign)
foot=yes/no (to make the situation clearer)

highway=footway (not suitable)
bicycle=yes (but allowed)
bicycle=dedicated (signed)

Or am I missing something?

 - Gustav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090812/e2946b67/attachment.html>