[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Nop]

Hi!

James Livingston schrieb:
 > On 12/08/2009, at 3:51 PM, Nop wrote:
 >> There is no consent on which way to go to express the strict use case.
 >
 > I think the only two solutions are to either have this be country- 
specific (at which point routers/renderers have to start knowing these 
kinds of things), or we have highway=cycleway not imply any value for 
foot at all.

Yes. Or we keep cycleway, but don't use it for road-signed cycling ways 
where it does not apply correctly. (e.g. in Germany)

bye
     Nop