[OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway

[Mike Harris]

... and in England you are forbidden to cycle on all designated footways
unless explicitly allowed! It neatly makes the point about regional
differences.
 
Mike Harris
 


  _____  

From: Gustav Foseid [mailto:gustavf at gmail.com] 
Sent: 12 August 2009 19:04
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs. footway


On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Nop <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:


highway=footway (not suitable)
bicycle=yes (but allowed)
bicycle=dedicated (signed)



A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me.



In Norway you are allowed to cycle on all footways, unless explicitly
forbidden.

 - Gustav


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090813/4f988ee1/attachment.html>