[OSM-talk] [Announce] OSMF license change vote has started
Stefan de Konink
stefan at konink.de
Sun Dec 6 04:52:23 GMT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
SteveC schreef:
> Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a policy*.
What a non-sense, every academic works with attribution of past work.
Including attribution in testsets and data being available.
You are getting a bit narrow minded in the direction you want to go.
...and I still don't understand why we can't offer layers of data with
any license that is on that layer. If people do prefer CC0/PD or in the
other extreme -NC they can just edit on there. Case solved, everyone happy.
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEAREKAAYFAksbOIYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3y6ACePMl3wjOJAnANHcs2NRzsNjix
ZWgAn1eUP4162kz7wI+4/Qt9DAYft6TB
=NKz8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the talk
mailing list