[OSM-talk] [Announce] OSMF license change vote has started

[SteveC]

On Dec 5, 2009, at 21:52, Stefan de Konink <stefan at konink.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> SteveC schreef:
>> Of course they said that, they only support PD-like licenses *as a  
>> policy*.
>
> What a non-sense, every academic works with attribution of past work.
> Including attribution in testsets and data being available.
>

It's nonsense but that's their direction.

> You are getting a bit narrow minded in the direction you want to go.

Me? What?

>
>
> ...and I still don't understand why we can't offer layers of data with
> any license that is on that layer. If people do prefer CC0/PD or in  
> the
> other extreme -NC they can just edit on there. Case solved, everyone  
> happy.
>
>
> Stefan
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEAREKAAYFAksbOIYACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3y6ACePMl3wjOJAnANHcs2NRzsNjix
> ZWgAn1eUP4162kz7wI+4/Qt9DAYft6TB
> =NKz8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>