[OSM-talk] Key:smoothness

[Dave Stubbs]

2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some
>> problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really
>> difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something.
>
> smoothness:vehicle would make sense to me. But, you know, water under
> the bridge and all that.
>

suitability_wheeled_vehicle would be even better.