lists at julius-net.net
Mon Feb 2 16:22:31 GMT 2009
Dave Stubbs <osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk> writes:
> 2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>:
>> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>>> Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some
>>> problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really
>>> difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something.
>> smoothness:vehicle would make sense to me. But, you know, water under
>> the bridge and all that.
> suitability_wheeled_vehicle would be even better.
Suitability sounds a bit more fitting than smoothness.
And one could put the type of vehicle into the value like
something like that.
More information about the talk