[OSM-talk] Key:smoothness

[Matthias Julius]

Dave Stubbs <osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk> writes:

> 2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>:
>> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some
>>> problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really
>>> difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards something.
>>
>> smoothness:vehicle would make sense to me. But, you know, water under
>> the bridge and all that.
>>
>
> suitability_wheeled_vehicle would be even better.

Suitability sounds a bit more fitting than smoothness.

And one could put the type of vehicle into the value like
'suitability=horse:good;mountainbike:bad;racebike:impossible' or
something like that.

Matthias