[OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] SVN rails_port questions: browse, relicensing

Simone Cortesi simone at cortesi.com
Wed Feb 11 19:58:11 GMT 2009

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> But could you perhaps check your code and see whether you have an option
> in there that allows the user not only to select agree/disagree but also
> the third option, "agree and PD". And if such an option is not in there,
> could you perhaps ask those who told you to implement the plan whether
> or not this is by design. If they say "yes, we left that out on purpose
> but we don't want anybody to know at this time", then just leave it at
> that and I'll hit them over the head at the next AGM. But if they should
> say "oh, we forgot about that and yes we thing it is a good idea, let's
> have the feature", then just add the feature.

By the way: does it sound too stupid to wait until next AGM or SOTM to
decide something on the new licence? Is there any real reason to do
this *right now* in hurry? or can we happily wait few months?

Can't we live in peace with CC-BY-SA up until summer?


More information about the talk mailing list