[OSM-talk] oneway yes or true
marcus.wolschon at googlemail.com
marcus.wolschon at googlemail.com
Fri Feb 27 11:10:52 GMT 2009
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:55:26 +0100, "sly (sylvain letuffe)"
<liste at letuffe.org> wrote:
>> no
>> false
>> 0
>> -1
>> all other values are ignored and treated as yes (why else would you have
>> a
>> oneway-tag).
>
> Ouch ! While using your software, I'll be extreamly carefull on the road
> ;-)
>
> Don't want to be droven on an "undefined" or "other" or "maybe" oneway
The opposite is true. "undefined" it is either a oneway=true or not.
In both cases I am allowed to drive it like a oneway=true and it
is the safest thing to do, to ignore this way in the opposite direction
as it is unclear if I am allowed to drive there or not.
Barely 200 roads in all of europe are not something I would worry about.
It's not like you can switch your eyes and brain off just because you have
a navigation system.
Well, anyway. We should better document these possible values in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
That's the place where mappers and developers look up the semantics of
key-value -pairs.
Marcus
>
> Europe counts :
> oneway | count
> ------------------------------------+--------
> yes | 466883
> 1 | 104487
> true | 100204
> no | 35883
> false | 3519
> -1 | 2683
> undefined | 197
> 0 | 24
> unknown | 11
> both | 11
> other | 9
> y | 7
> ??? | 7
> Yes | 6
> yees | 6
> variable | 6
> morning to south, evening to North | 5
> FIXME | 5
> alternate | 4
> 2 | 4
> True | 3
> ye | 3
> yes/-1 | 3
> R760 | 3
> true; 1; true | 2
> yes; yes; true; yes; yes | 2
> hy | 2
> no;yes | 2
> +1 | 2
> maybe | 2
> no? | 2
>
>
More information about the talk
mailing list