[OSM-talk] License plan

Peter Miller peter.miller at itoworld.com
Fri Feb 27 15:15:15 GMT 2009

On 27 Feb 2009, at 15:05, Chris Hill wrote:

> Peter Miller wrote:
>> Would it be appropriate to continue this conversation on legal- 
>> talk?  Talk is very busy at the moment and we have a lovely list of  
>> our own :)
> Emoticon aside, I think the licence is far too important to just  
> discuss among a cosy few.  When I tried to join legal (out of  
> interest) I could not.
>> With regard to these questions, lets make a clear distinction  
>> between  the question (which anyone is qualified to raise) and the  
>> answer (for  which one is likely to need to be a lawyer)!
> I don't need to be a lawyer to have an opinion and just because  
> someone is a lawyer doesn't mean they are right.
> So, is there a succinct summary of the proposals,plans and options?

There are a bunch of wiki pages of varying quality and accuracy that  
relate to the licence here:

Sure, there are also a bunch of unanswered questions and as I am 'on  
the outside' as well I don't have the answers to them and actually I  
think the people on the inside are still working on some of them. I  
suggest that we capture the questions on the 'open issues' wiki page



> Cheers, Chris

More information about the talk mailing list