[OSM-talk] OSM and Linked Data, and W3C, etc ...

[brendan barrett]

"Yeah, because none of us have any idea what we're doing, we're just a
bunch of clueless fuckwits that are intent on buggering up
everything."

I think this was a little harsh. When i'm working on a project, I
welcome any input I can get. It doesn't mean I stop doing what i'm
doing. It never hurts getting others to review things. You don't need
to stop development on API 0.6 to do a review. If someone would like
to review it (as a parallel process) and post some additional thoughts
on the design... then why not? It doesn't have to stop any current
work.


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:
> Ian Dees wrote:
>
>> I think it would be very handy to have a couple database experts that
>> are not attached to OSM and its current setup look at the plans for API
>> 0.6 as a code and design review. I haven't seen much about 0.6 (and I'm
>> not trying to bash the progress that has been made), but I imagine that
>> getting a few fresh eyeballs on its design would be extremely helpful
>> for OSM in the long run.
>
> Yeah, because none of us have any idea what we're doing, we're just a
> bunch of clueless fuckwits that are intent on buggering up everything.
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
> http://www.compton.nu/
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>