[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)]

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:25:17 +1000, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:41 PM, John Smith<delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com>
wrote:
>> Either way, expanding the existing tag makes more sense than creating 2
>> differently named tags which will cause even more confusion and
>> duplication.
> 
> I agree. So, how about maxheight:physical, maxheight:legal, and leave
> room for others if there is a demonstrable need in future?
> 
> I am tempted to suggest maxheight:physical:bridge,
> maxheight:physical:trees, etc., but that is probably unnecessary at
> this stage.
> 
> 
If this is your suggestion to solve this, than I suggest you do something
about it and get that information on the maxheight documentation. I am not
sure how you intend this to be done. When you have a process going, point
me there, the current documentation on maxheight does not support the needs
for me, so my solution was to make another tag. I havn't seen you do more
about it than to attack my attempt to solve this.

-- 
Brgds
Aun Johnsen
via Webmail