[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[John Smith]

--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) <skippern at gimnechiske.org> wrote:

> If this is your suggestion to solve this, than I suggest
> you do something
> about it and get that information on the maxheight
> documentation. I am not
> sure how you intend this to be done. When you have a
> process going, point
> me there, the current documentation on maxheight does not
> support the needs
> for me, so my solution was to make another tag. I havn't
> seen you do more
> about it than to attack my attempt to solve this.

Is there really such an overwhelming need to mark the physical difference to the legal difference?

The reason I haven't done anything is because I think maxheight is sufficient.

As someone else pointed out, if there is a curved shaped clearance the only one that will care would be those on unicycles.