[OSM-talk] tagging "unofficial" cycle routes

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com
Tue Jun 2 15:03:24 BST 2009

If the routes are fairly immutable - ie they're the routes that anyone
studying the problem would probably end up with, or wouldn't dispute, then I
think it's reasonable to add them to the map. The routes are fixed; they
just lack signposting.

If however, they're just the favourite route among several alternatives,
then I think you need to mark ones that are signposted on the ground.


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:19 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> In the Philippines there are very few (close to nothing I know of)
> officially designated cycleways and routes.  However, local
> cycling/mtb clubs have created/established routes for their own
> purpose.  Any advice on how to tag these routes?
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090602/0a9f4912/attachment.html>

More information about the talk mailing list