[OSM-talk] tagging "unofficial" cycle routes

[maning sambale]

Thanks for all the insights.

Just a thought, legally designating cycleways and routes in the Phil.,
won't come anytime soon.  Partly due to poor urban planning and
others.

But I digress, back to mapping.

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Richard Mann
<richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:
> If the routes are fairly immutable - ie they're the routes that anyone
> studying the problem would probably end up with, or wouldn't dispute, then I
> think it's reasonable to add them to the map. The routes are fixed; they
> just lack signposting.
>
> If however, they're just the favourite route among several alternatives,
> then I think you need to mark ones that are signposted on the ground.
>
> Richard
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:19 AM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the Philippines there are very few (close to nothing I know of)
>> officially designated cycleways and routes.  However, local
>> cycling/mtb clubs have created/established routes for their own
>> purpose.  Any advice on how to tag these routes?
>>
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------