[OSM-talk] highway=tertiary[_link?] (was: Re: highway=secondary_link)

Andrew Chadwick (email lists) andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org
Mon Mar 2 12:49:13 GMT 2009


Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> 
> Would adding also highway=tertiary_link be too much? :-)

I'm not sure I can think of any examples in the areas I'm familiar with.
Perhaps that's just due to local road design though: link-like
structures seem to be reserved for faster, more multi-lane road designs.

Not having link roads: a concrete criterion for highway=tertiary? :-)

-- 
Andrew Chadwick




More information about the talk mailing list