[OSM-talk] highway=tertiary[_link?] (was: Re: highway=secondary_link)
Andrew Chadwick (email lists)
andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org
Mon Mar 2 12:49:13 GMT 2009
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>
> Would adding also highway=tertiary_link be too much? :-)
I'm not sure I can think of any examples in the areas I'm familiar with.
Perhaps that's just due to local road design though: link-like
structures seem to be reserved for faster, more multi-lane road designs.
Not having link roads: a concrete criterion for highway=tertiary? :-)
--
Andrew Chadwick
More information about the talk
mailing list