[OSM-talk] highway=tertiary[_link?] (was: Re: highway=secondary_link)

MP singularita at gmail.com
Mon Mar 2 14:18:59 GMT 2009


http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/*[highway=tertiary_link] -> 1.3mb file

Well, these seems to be quite a lot tertiary_links out there ...

For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.95321&lon=11.57331&zoom=16
(not rendered though, you have to use some editor to see it)

So I'd say we should have tertiary links too.

Martin

On 02/03/2009, Andrew Chadwick (email lists)
<andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org> wrote:
> Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>  >
>  > Would adding also highway=tertiary_link be too much? :-)
>
>  I'm not sure I can think of any examples in the areas I'm familiar with.
>  Perhaps that's just due to local road design though: link-like
>  structures seem to be reserved for faster, more multi-lane road designs.
>
>  Not having link roads: a concrete criterion for highway=tertiary? :-)




More information about the talk mailing list