[OSM-talk] immutable=yes Fwd: DEC Lands
Andy Allan
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 18:18:27 GMT 2009
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Russ Nelson <russ at cloudmade.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
>> If you can't edit it it shouldn't be in the OSM db. It's easy enough
>> to set up your own map render with any external data you want.
>
> Bzzzr, wrong. There is substantial value to renderers to only have to
> work off one API for map data. If the data is in OSM, then
> immediately every map renderer has access to it. If, say, someone
> finds a new data source but declines to dd it to OSM, then EVERY
> RENDERER needs to add support for that file format and metadata in
> order to use it.
Umm, no. You're wrong on this case, and I speak from running one of
the main OSM renderers. Ted is correct.
> Sorry, Ted, but you're being driven by ideology here, not by good
> programming practise. Ideology is for ideots.
No he's not, and plenty of other people are in agreement here. It's a
question of the point of having a community in OSM (vs a large
collection of uneditable datasets), and you're arguing about technical
stuff. Technical comes second, community first.
Cheers,
Andy
More information about the talk
mailing list