[OSM-talk] highway=cycle&footway

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com
Fri Mar 27 12:01:11 GMT 2009


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, David Earl <david at frankieandshadow.com>wrote:


> On 26/03/2009 17:14, Richard Mann wrote:
>
>> highway=cycleway+designation=public_bridleway does the job with the
>> minimum of fuss.
>>
>
> and requires us either to change the renderers or mislead horse riders.
> David
>
>
>

I think the OSM principle is that you get the tagging coherent, and let the
renderers adapt. I don't suppose there are actually many improved bridleways
out there that would get re-tagged and horse-riders misled. There are
probably already quite a lot that have been tagged as cycleways, with the
designation information lost.

As for rendering, I might go for red-dotted for footway, green-dashed for
path, green-dash-dotted for bridleway, blue-dashed for cycleway and
blue-dash-dotted for (cycleway & (designation=public_bridleway or
horse=yes)). But that's not my call.

Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090327/ef621e5f/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list