[OSM-talk] Flickr Now Supports OSM Tags

Dave Stubbs osm.list at randomjunk.co.uk
Thu Oct 1 13:03:47 BST 2009


On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:
> Dave Stubbs wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, he is a leader because we respect him.  THAT is how leaders in
>>>>> an anarchic state arise.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some
>>>> useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this
>>>> childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions.
>>>> a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
>>>> fee for free access to an amazing database.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The discussion is only childish if the tone of the discussion is
>>> childish.
>>> But if people discuss this issue in a good manner, then it isn't
>>> childish.
>>>
>>> If we can remove that small fee, why not do it?
>>>
>>> What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given
>>> appropriate
>>> changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a deprecation
>>> period
>>> for other boolean values?
>>>
>>
>>
>> what's so hard?
>> The hard part is figuring out what the hell any of this actually has
>> to do with the thread topic.
>> Amazingly tag-standardisation is not even /relevant/ to the original
>> problem pointed out.
>> Oh well... wouldn't be the internet if someone wasn't wrong on it.
>>
>
> Did you not read Kyle's post - 29th 15:25

Yes.
The original problem pointed out that I was referring to was: "It
works for building=yes, but not building=true".

Dave




More information about the talk mailing list