[OSM-talk] Flickr Now Supports OSM Tags
davefox at madasafish.com
Thu Oct 1 12:28:37 BST 2009
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com>
>>> On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote:
>>>> No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in
>>>> an anarchic state arise.
>>> yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some
>>> useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this
>>> childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions.
>>> a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small
>>> fee for free access to an amazing database.
>> The discussion is only childish if the tone of the discussion is childish.
>> But if people discuss this issue in a good manner, then it isn't childish.
>> If we can remove that small fee, why not do it?
>> What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given appropriate
>> changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a deprecation period
>> for other boolean values?
> what's so hard?
> The hard part is figuring out what the hell any of this actually has
> to do with the thread topic.
> Amazingly tag-standardisation is not even /relevant/ to the original
> problem pointed out.
> Oh well... wouldn't be the internet if someone wasn't wrong on it.
Did you not read Kyle's post - 29th 15:25
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the talk