[OSM-talk] SteveC should decide
frederik at remote.org
Sat Oct 3 02:36:31 BST 2009
edodd at billiau.net wrote:
> This is likely to result in several insular communities. In particular I
> am considering that au mappers would write a tight set of guidelines for
> mapping and, as an example, we wouldn't have to worry about "residential
> vs unclassified in rural areas" for any other country - we would define
> our own strategy and stick to it.
In general, I think that this is a good thing. You know best how to deal
with roads in .au; you know what *you* need to map to make the data
useful for you - and not some tagging committee from England which tries
to accommodate Argentinia as well. If I, as a tourist, should visit
Australia, would I prefer a map made by a world-wide consortium who
tries to streamline every national idiosyncracy into their scheme, or
would I prefer a map made by locals? I think that's one of the great
strengths of OSM that we have the local knowledge on our side.
I have often said, and do so again, that regional diversity is not
necessarily a bad thing and certainly not something that needs to be
eradicated for the sake of conformism - it can be dealt with on another
layer (for example the "likeness" thing that Steve recently mentioned).
If there is a possible problem with my suggestion then that would not
regional tagging differences, but various "schools" of tagging evolving
and being used in one and the same area. But I think that would sort
itself out come time and anyway, we're not even there yet.
> If Au does that, and the Argentinians make their own set of preferences,
> and other groups do the same, we will have a project with multiple forks.
No, just regional diversity. I would somewhat expect the Australian
tourist, out of respect, to not apply their home tagging rules when they
map in Argentinia, but have a look around and do as the locals do. (As
most of us, I am sure, already do today!)
More information about the talk