[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (boundary=military)

Russ Nelson nelson at crynwr.com
Thu Oct 15 07:13:36 BST 2009

Dave F. writes:
 > The "just go ahead & do it" philosophy that some advocate just puts 
 > errors into OSM that may not get fully removed, especially if they've 
 > been around for a while & have been copied by others.

Please go back to my proposed steps.  What "errors" do you see defined
there?  The only error that I see is to fail to document your use of a
tag in the wiki.  Because other, more serious errors, are averted by
your attempt to document it.  If it's already there, and has a
different meaning than the one you have chosen, there's your red flag
that proceeding would be an error.

Map it, tag it, and document it.  Worry less about making a misteak,
and map more.

--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241    
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog       

More information about the talk mailing list