[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (boundary=military)
nelson at crynwr.com
Thu Oct 15 07:13:36 BST 2009
Dave F. writes:
> The "just go ahead & do it" philosophy that some advocate just puts
> errors into OSM that may not get fully removed, especially if they've
> been around for a while & have been copied by others.
Please go back to my proposed steps. What "errors" do you see defined
there? The only error that I see is to fail to document your use of a
tag in the wiki. Because other, more serious errors, are averted by
your attempt to document it. If it's already there, and has a
different meaning than the one you have chosen, there's your red flag
that proceeding would be an error.
Map it, tag it, and document it. Worry less about making a misteak,
and map more.
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
More information about the talk