[OSM-talk] multipolygon (lake) not rendering
osm at inbox.org
Mon Oct 26 14:16:13 GMT 2009
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Anthony wrote:
>> Do advanced multipolygons have to have an inner?
> Personally, I am hoping that we will (re)introduce a proper area data type
> some day because even though the multipolygons were a good idea at the time,
> they do seem a bit clumsy now.
What would be the advantage of an area data type? Would this be a
separate table or just a type of relation?
More information about the talk