[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -(man_made=mineshaft)
lesi at lesi.is-a-geek.net
Tue Oct 27 23:12:34 GMT 2009
> Some questions:
> - Do you think it is better to use a namespaced tag (mineshaft:type) or a
> normal tag (mineshaft_type)? In the current proposal the first one is
> But looking at other features i think that in this case a normal tag would
> be better. It's also bunker_type for example:
> - In the forum somebody has suggested to add a tag for the name of the
> the mineshaft belongs to. At first I thought this would be the same as
> operator, but actually it is not. So which tag would be appropriate?
There were no further comments, so I've changed mineshaft:type to
I've also added the mine-tag.
More information about the talk