[OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?

[Anthony]

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> If it's a single physical section, ie a bridge with all the lanes
>> physically connected then it should only be one way and we should be
>> able to tag the individual lanes.
>>
>
> Everything in the world is physically connected.  In this case, let's leave
> out the cycle lane and footpath and just consider a dual carriage way (with
> central reservation).  There are two roads and an island which go over one
> bridge.  One way, two, or three?
>

If you'd prefer a picture:
http://bikeportland.org/wp-content/bikelaneMontreal.jpg

One way, or more than one way?

If your answer is one way, I vehemently disagree.  If your answer is more
than one way, then tagging subsections of ways is off-topic.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090920/b8fca41c/attachment.html>