[OSM-talk] Should Bridges be independent of their ways?
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Sun Sep 20 15:33:18 BST 2009
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:27 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>wrote:
> 2009/9/21 Anthony <osm at inbox.org>:
>
> > So this is a single way?
> >
> http://bikelaneblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/pulaski-bridge-walkway.jpg?w=324&h=241
> >
> > That's nutty.
>
> And abusing relations to do the same thing isn't?
>
Irrelevant. I never said you had to use relations. In fact, I said you
don't.
I wouldn't call the use of relations "nutty", though.
> As long as you are free to change lanes, I disagree. The maxheight of a
> way
> > is the maximum height of the way. Using a GPS doesn't permit you to
> ignore
> > signs which say to stay out of the right lane.
>
> You miss the point entirely, the GPS could indicate which lane you
> need to be in if you program it with your current height.
>
Fine. You can add "maximum height" along with "maximum speed" to your list
of lane-specific data.
I don't find it very important, but if you want to allow for this, without
messing up anyone else, feel free.
> > Have you ever been on a bridge with a Jersey barrier? Is that one
> bridge,
> > or two?
>
> Ever been on a bridge with dynamic lane changes depending on time of day?
>
Yes.
> Maybe the last one. Anything else, is "physically separated", but could
> > easily be accomplished over a single bridge (one of them even *is* an
> > example of a single bridge).
>
> Do you even grasp the benefit of being able to tag lanes rather than ways?
>
Yes, I do. Have you read what I said?
> Pretty much all the examples you posted are exactly why we need to be
> able to tag lanes, thanks for proving my point for me.
>
So you think those examples should all be represented as a single way?
That's horrible.
> You keep saying you can tag a way with the maximum maxspeed but that's
> nonsense, that isn't being able to tag the real world accurately
> that's tagging a subset of the real world.
>
The maximum speed of a way is the maximum speed of that way. If you want to
*also* tag lane speeds, feel free.
http://bikelaneblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/pulaski-bridge-walkway.jpg?w=324&h=241
One bridge or two?
If it's one, then you are off-topic.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090920/3f130187/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list