[OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM

[Martijn van Exel]

Adding source tags never hurts. I believe source=bing is what is sort of
agreed upon.

Martijn van Exel +++ m at rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes


On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:

> It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs to
> be added, but I managed to get it to work.
>
> So now i'm mapping all those rivers/streams and the landuses that are
> almost impossible to accomplish otherwise. Should I add source tags to all
> the elements I'm tracing from Bing imagery? What about the landuses that I'm
> modifying? Is the source mixed then?
>
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20101201/811b5dca/attachment.html>