[OSM-talk] Unsetting CT flag
Grant Slater
openstreetmap at firefishy.com
Wed Dec 8 11:51:50 GMT 2010
On 8 December 2010 10:58, Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is simply because we are at the voluntary phase of agreeing with
>> the CT right now. If you wholeheartedly agree with the CT, then you
>> can indicate your preference right now.
>>
>> When we are at the mandatory phase, then and only then will the
>> agreement have a decline button.
>
> With respect, the logic here seems a bit twisted. And, speaking as the
> first victim of accidental accession, it doesn't feel very "voluntary"
> if I can't unset my CT flag. It feels more like a trap which I
> inadvertently stumbled into.
>
Steve,
Partially a rhetorical question... What would the project do if
someone uploaded data to OSM and then said they had not agreed to
contributing the data under CC-BY-SA?
Out of interest here is the history of project's contributing terms...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/History
PS: Your email to LWG was received, but we have not yet had a chance
to discuss and respond. We meet again next Tuesday.
Regards
Grant
More information about the talk
mailing list