[OSM-talk] Massive import of airports

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 12/17/10 09:43, David Paleino wrote:
> today I've stumbled upon changeset 6682943 [0] in my area, and, digging
> further, I found its companions listed in [1].

Imports on such scale should be discussed before they're done, and 
documented after. In this case, a discussion would probably have yielded 
the recommendation to automatically detect duplicates.

Complete lack of discussion is reason enough for a revert in my opinion. 
I'd suggest contacting the importer and asking him where/how he has 
heard the community about his plans and whether he intends to fix the 
problems.

Bye
Frederik