[OSM-talk] Fwd: Nav4All navigation shut down by Navteq

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 00:00:10 GMT 2010


On 3 February 2010 09:32, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> It can't be the murky details of cycleways and bridleways because the
> commercial providers don't have that, or if they have it then only in
> selected areas. It can't be highway=path and all that because they don't
> have it. It can't be - in my opinion! - the top highway types from
> motorway down to residential because they aren't any better in that than
> we are (or are they).

Actually I was confused by that too, which is why I asked for a
suggested tagging scheme.

> It could be turn restrictions; I agree that an easy editor for those is
> required - but while the tagging rules are a bit complex for turn
> restrictions, they are not mayhem - they are perfectly clear.

The problem isn't that tagging is complicated, it is how can editors
make it easier.




More information about the talk mailing list