[OSM-talk] Defective GPS trace
Steve Bennett
stevagewp at gmail.com
Sun Jan 3 08:36:11 GMT 2010
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier <jm at liotier.org> wrote:
> That would be using a map as an item in a to-do list. It would look ugly
> to me and I doubt that many people would support that use. Better keep
> the todo list separate - in another layer if you want it represented
> geographically.
>
Yes and no. A straight line works almost as well for routing as a correctly
surveyed road, and much better than a non-existent way. So rather than a "to
do list", it's more like a first draft.
You might say that in order of priority, we would like the following
information about every road:
1) Start and end point
2) Major junctions
3) Name
4) Minor junctions
5) Exact route.
6) Surface
7) Width, lanes, speed limit...
The order is debatable though.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20100103/6e00126f/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list